Tunis, September 25, 2021Tunisia: President’s power grab an alarming slide towards authoritarianism
The promulgation, on September 22, of Presidential Decree no. 117 implicitly abrogating the constitutional order in Tunisia is a first step towards authoritarianism. This turning point threatens the human rights and democratic aspirations of the Tunisian people. While recognizing the limits of the current political system established by the constitution of 2014, we call for any reform of this system to be carried out in full respect of the constitutional order, and in particular of the separation of powers and in full guarantee of fundamental freedoms and human rights. There may be a need to rethink the political system and to reform the 2014 Constitution,however, these reforms cannot be dictated unilaterally by the presidential power without pluralist debate and effective control. According to presidential decree 117, the constitution of 2014 was suspended except for the preamble and the first two chapters on general provisions and rights and freedoms. The transitional provisions provide the President of the Republic solely with the prerogative to legislate in all areas whether related to the organization of justice and the judiciary, the organization of information, the press, the organization of political parties, unions, associations, organizations and professional orders as well as their financing, the organization of internal security forces and customs, the electoral law, freedoms and human rights, personal status, or local power, and the organic budget law. The Presidency goes even further and reverses the universal rule of the supremacy of the constitution by placing the presidential decree-laws above the constitution. The chapters maintained in the constitution will only be respected when they do not contravene the exceptional measures and presidential decree-laws. The constitution is no longer the source of laws, and no recourse will be possible against the presidential decrees. The provisional body for the review of the constitutionality of laws has been suspended. The President of the Republic exercises all executive powers and will be assisted by a government that acts entirely at the discretion of the President, who in turn chairs the Council of Ministers. All these powers are vested in the presidency without any time limit. Under the disguise of a roadmap, the Presidentwith the support of a commission will be responsible for drawing up political reformsin order to establish "a true democratic regime in which the people are effectively the holders of sovereignty". Contrary to recurring announcements by the President of the Republic, he has not progressed in the fight against corruption or against the impunity regarding the martyrs of the revolution, transitional justice, political assassinations and terrorism. There is also no clear program on how to stem the economic crisis that has plagued Tunisia for years.Tunisia, which has so far been the only country in the region that inspired hope for real change, seems to have turned its back on the emerging democracy. Time and again in history, we have seen the serious consequences for human rights when either the executive or the presidential authorityseizedpower. We recall that international human rights law authorizes, under strict conditions, the promulgation of emergency powers. However, these are temporary derogations strictly conditioned by the principles of legality, necessity and proportionality and by the existence of rigorous judicial control. Above all, international law requires that emergency situations be dealt with within the framework of the rule of law. Any change in the political or constitutional framework must happen within the framework provided by the Constitution, which foresees the conditions for its own modification in full respect of the democratic process. Faced with the alarming drifts we are witnessing, national and international civil society organizations strongly denounce the decisions taken unilaterally by President Kais Said, reaffirm their unwavering attachment to democratic principles and condemn the seizure of power and the lack of any form of safeguards. We undertake to support any process aimed at overcoming the current political and constitutional crisis on condition that it respects the rule of law, human rights guarantees and the democratic expression of the aspirations of the people. List of signatories
Il va plus loin et se permet d’inverser la règle universelle de suprématie de la constitution en accordant aux décrets lois une valeur supérieure à la constitution puisque même les chapitres qu’il a maintenus dans la constitution, ne sont respectés que lorsqu’ils ne contreviennent pas aux mesures d’exception et aux décrets lois qu’il adopte.
L’exercice du pouvoir exécutif revient aussi au président de la République assisté d’un gouvernement constitué de ministères qu’il peut supprimer et de ministres qu’il peut limoger. Il préside le conseil des ministres et peut déléguer cette prérogative à un chef du gouvernement qu’il nomme.Tous ces pouvoirs sont conférés à la présidence sans limitation dans le temps.
Nous avons vu à maintes reprises dans l’histoire les conséquences graves pour les droits humains d’un accaparement de compétences quasi illimitées par l’exécutif ou l’autorité présidentielle
Nous rappelons que le droit international des droits humains autorise, dans des conditions strictes, l’adoption de pouvoirs d’exception, mais il s’agit là de dérogations temporaires strictement conditionnées par les principes de légalité, nécessité et proportionnalité et par l’existence d’un contrôle juridictionnel rigoureux. Le droit international requiert avant tout que les situations d’urgence soient traitées dans le cadre de l’État de droit. Tout changement du cadre politique et constitutionnel doit être élaboré dans le cadre prévu par la Constitution qui prévoit les conditions de sa propre modification, dans le respect du processus démocratique.
- Le Labo’ Démocratique